Nietzsche Genealogy Of Morals Essay 1984
In philosophy, genealogy is a historical technique in which one questions the commonly understood emergence of various philosophical and social beliefs by attempting to account for the scope, breadth or totality of Discourse, thus extending the possibility of analysis, as opposed to the Marxist use of the term Ideology to explain the totality of historical discourse within the time period in question by focusing on a singular or dominant discourse (ideology). Moreover, a genealogy often attempts to look beyond the discourse in question toward the conditions of their possibility (particularly in Foucault's genealogies). It has been developed as continuation of the works of Friedrich Nietzsche.
Nietzsche criticized "the genealogists" in On the Genealogy of Morals and proposed the use of a historic philosophy to critique modern morality by supposing that it developed into its current form through power relations. But scholars note that he emphasizes that, rather than being purely necessary developments of power relations, these developments are to be exposed as at least partially contingent, the upshot being that the present conception of morality could always have been constituted otherwise. Even though the philosophy of Nietzsche has been characterized as genealogy, he only uses the term in On the Genealogy of Morals. The later philosophy that has been influenced by Nietzsche, and which is commonly described as genealogy, shares several fundamental aspects of Nietzschean philosophical insight. Nietzschean historic philosophy has been described as "a consideration of oppositional tactics" that embraces, as opposed to forecloses, the conflict between philosophical and historical accounts.
In the late twentieth century, Michel Foucault expanded the concept of genealogy into a counter-history of the position of the subject which traces the development of people and societies through history. His genealogy of the subject accounts "for the constitution of knowledges, discourses, domains of objects, and so on, without having to make reference to a subject which is either transcendental in relation to the field of events or runs in its empty sameness throughout the course of history."
As Foucault discussed in his essay "Nietzsche, Genealogy, History", Foucault's ideas of genealogy were greatly influenced by the work that Nietzsche had done on the development of morals through power. Foucault also describes genealogy as a particular investigation into those elements which "we tend to feel [are] without history". This would include things such as sexuality, and other elements of everyday life. Genealogy is not the search for origins, and is not the construction of a linear development. Instead it seeks to show the plural and sometimes contradictory past that reveals traces of the influence that power has had on truth.
As one of the important theories of Michel Foucault, genealogy deconstructs truth, arguing that truth is, more often than not, discovered by chance, backed up by the operation of Power/knowledge or the consideration of interest. Furthermore, all truths are questionable. Pointing out the unreliability of truth, which is often accused as "having tendency of relativity and nihilism", the theory flatly refuses the uniformity and regularity of history, emphasizing the irregularity and inconstancy of truth and toppling the notion that history progresses in a linear order.
The practice of genealogy is also closely linked to what Foucault called the "archeological method:"
In short, it seems that from the empirical observability for us of an ensemble to its historical acceptability, to the very period of time in which it is actually observable, the analysis goes by way of the knowledge-power nexus, supporting it, recouping it at the point where it is accepted, moving toward what makes it acceptable, of course, not in general, but only where it is accepted. This is what can be characterized as recouping it in its positivity. Here, then, is a type of procedure, which, unconcerned with legitimizing and consequently excluding the fundamental point of view of the law, runs through the cycle of positivity by proceeding from the fact of acceptance to the system of acceptability analyzed through the knowledge-power interplay. Let us say that this is, approximately, the archaeological level [of analysis].
dialogues and anthologies
- ^di Georgio, Paul (2013). "Contingency and Necessity in the Genealogy of Morality". TELOS. 2013 (162): 97–111. doi:10.3817/0313162097. Retrieved 7 April 2015.
- ^Ransom, John (1997). Foucault's Discipline. Durham: Duke University Press. p. 7. ISBN 0-8223-1878-4.
- ^Michel Foucault Lectures At The College de France Society Must Be Defended 1975
- ^Foucault, Michel (2003). The Essential Foucault: Selections from Essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984. New York, NY: The New Press. p. 306. ISBN 1-56584-801-2.
- ^Foucault, Michel (1980). Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. p. 139. ISBN 0-8014-9204-1.
- ^Foucault, Michel. "What is Critique?" in The Politics of Truth, Ed. Sylvère Lotringer. New York: Semiotext(e), 2007, pg. 61.
Acampora, Christa Davis. “Of Dangerous Games and Dastardly Deeds: A Typology of Nietzsche's Contests.” International Studies in Philosophy34/3 (Fall 2002), 135–151.
Acampora, Christa Davis, ed. Nietzsche's On the Genealogy of Morals: Critical Essays. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006.
Allison, David B.Reading the New Nietzsche. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.
Anscombe, G. E. M. “Modern Moral Philosophy.” Philosophy33 (1958), 1–19.
Ansell-Pearson, Keith. “Nietzsche: A Radical Challenge to Political Theory?” Radical Philosophy54 (Spring 1990), 10–18.
Ansell-Pearson, Keith. An Introduction to Nietzsche as a Political Thinker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Appel, Fredrick. Nietzsche Contra Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999.
Aristotle, . Poetics. Trans. Sachs, Joe. Newburyport, MA: Focus Publishing, 2006.
Ascheim, Steven E.The Nietzsche Legacy in Germany, 1890–1990. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.
Babich, Babette. “A Note on Chaos Sive Natura: On Theogony, Genesis, and Playing Stars.” New Nietzsche Studies5, 3/4 and 6, 1/2 (Winter 2003/Spring 2004), 48–70.
Bernstein, Alan E.The Formation of Hell. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.
Binion, Rudolph. Frau Lou: Nietzsche's Wayward Disciple. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974.
Burkert, Walter. Greek Religion. Trans. Raffan, John. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.
Chukwudi Eze, Emmanuel. Achieving Our Humanity: The Idea of the Postracial Future. New York: Routledge, 2001.
Clark, Maudemarie. Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Claus, David B.Toward the Soul: An Inquiry into the Meaning of Psuchē Before Plato. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981.
Connolly, William E.Political Theory and Modernity. London: Blackwell, 1988.
Connolly, William E.Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.
Conway, Daniel W.Nietzsche and the Political. New York: Routledge, 1997.
Conway, Daniel W. “Wir Erkennenden: Self-Referentiality in the Preface to Zur Genealogie der Moral.” Journal of Nietzsche Studies22 (Fall 2001), 116–132.
Cox, Christoph. Nietzsche: Naturalism and Interpretation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.
Crisp, Roger, and Michael, Slote, eds. Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Curtis, David Ames, ed. Philosophy, Politics, Autonomy: Essays in Political Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
Daigle, Christine. “Nietzsche: Virtue Ethics…Virtue Politics?” Journal of Nietzsche Studies32 (Autumn 2006), 1–21.
Daly, Markate, ed. Communitarianism: A New Public Ethics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1994.
Detwiler, Bruce. Nietzsche and the Politics of Aristocratic Radicalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.
Dodds, E. R.The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968.
Ferry, Luc, and Alain, Renaut, eds. Why We Are Not Nietzscheans. Trans. Loaiza, Robert. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.
Golomb, Jacob, and Wistrich, Robert S., eds. Nietzsche, Godfather of Fascism? On the Uses and Abuses of a Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.
Goodrich, Peter, and Mariana, Valverde, eds. Nietzsche and Legal Theory: Half-Written Laws. New York: Routledge, 2005.
Griffen, Jasper. Homer on Life and Death. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.
Habermas, Jürgen. “The Entwinement of Myth and Enlightenment: Rereading Dialectic of Enlightenment.” New German Critique26 (1982), 13–30.
Habermas, Jürgen. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Trans. Lawrence, Frederick G.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987.
Halliwell, Stephen. The Aesthetics of Mimesis. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.
Hatab, Lawrence J.Myth and Philosophy: A Contest of Truths. Chicago: Open Court, 1990.
Hatab, Lawrence J.A Nietzschean Defense of Democracy: An Experiment in Postmodern Politics. Chicago: Open Court, 1995.
Hatab, Lawrence J.Ethics and Finitude: Heideggerian Contributions to Moral Philosophy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.
Hatab, Lawrence J.Nietzsche's Life Sentence: Coming to Terms with Eternal Recurrence. New York: Routledge, 2005.
Hayman, Ronald. Nietzsche: A Critical Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.
Hollingdale, R. J.Nietzsche: The Man and His Philosophy. Second edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Honig, Bonnie. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.
Hunt, Lester H.Nietzsche and the Origin of Virtue. London: Routledge, 1991.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason. Trans. Beck, Lewis White. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1956.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Trans. Pluhar, Werner. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 1987.
Kemal, S. “Some Problems of Genealogy.” Nietzsche Studien19 (1990), 30–42.
Leiter, Brian. Nietzsche on Morality. New York: Routledge, 2002.
Loraux, Nicole. The Divided City: On Memory and Forgetting in Ancient Athens. Trans. Pache, Corrine. New York: Zone Books, 2001.
Luban, David. Lawyers and Justice: An Ethical Study. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.
MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981.
Magnus, Bernd. “Nietzsche's Philosophy in 1888: The Will to Power and the Übermensch.” Journal of the History of Philosophy24/1 (January 1986), 79–98.
Magnus, Bernd. “Self-Consuming Concepts.” International Studies in Philosophy21/2 (1989), 63–71.
May, Simon. Nietzsche's Ethics and His War on Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.
Mitchell, Joshua. Not by Reason Alone: Religion, History and Identity in Early Modern Political Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
Murdoch, Iris. The Sovereignty of Good. New York: Schocken Books, 1970.
Nehamas, Alexander. Nietzsche: Life as Literature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.
Neiman, Susan. Evil in Modern Thought: An Alternative History of Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.
Nussbaum, Martha C.The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Owen, David. Nietzsche, Politics, and Modernity. London: Sage, 1995.
Owen, David. “Equality, Democracy, and Self-Respect: Reflections on Nietzsche's Agonal Perfectionism.” Journal of Nietzsche Studies24 (Fall 2002), 113–131.
Peters, H. F.Zarathustra's Sister: The Case of Elisabeth and Friedrich Nietzsche. New York: Markus Wiener, 1985.